Prévia do material em texto
This book is primarily intended for advanced undergraduates, graduate stu- dents, and researchers interested in learn- ing and memory. After a brief introduction to the basics of learning and memory at the psychological level, the book will describe current understanding of memory at the molecular and cellular level. Particular emphasis will be on the hippocampus and its role in declarative and spatial learning, although examples from other anatomical and behavioral systems will also be used. As the book overall progresses from chapter to chapter, I will deliberately move from well-established facts and background, to a description of current work and thinking in the area, to at last what should be clearly labeled speculation. In my opinion, this book is appropriate for use in advanced undergraduate and graduate-level learning and memory courses, courses that typically are based in Psychology, Biology, and Neuroscience Departments at the University and Medical School levels. I hope that it provides a nice foundation for thinking about the molecular underpinnings of synap- tic plasticity and information storage. However, the book is primarily targeted to active researchers (at all stages of their career development) in the learning and memory fields. One goal of the book is to begin to embrace the complexity of mechanisms of learning and memory at the molecular level. Some who work on the cellular processes of learning and memory seem to want to ignore this complexity, deny its existence, or throw up their hands in frustration and imply that the problem is insoluble. I share none of these viewpoints. My hope in this book is to begin to organize a framework of thinking about synaptic plasticity and memory at the molecular level—one which recognizes and begins to incorporate this extreme biochemical com- plexity into our thinking about memory. I note that building these models is at a relatively early stage, but one thing the reader hopefully will take from the book is some perspective on where we stand at present and where the future may lie. Most of us have seen the large and complex schematic diagrams summarizing intermediary metabolism. Hundreds of discrete and highly regulated enzymatic steps are necessary for the relatively basic function of converting glucose into ATP. How can memory be any less complex than that at the molecular level? Human learning and memory is likely the most highly evolved and sophisticated biologi- cal process in existence. In my view, the ultimate molecular understanding of xiii Preface 8957-Prelims 25/7/03 11:56 AM Page xiii learning and memory will make processes such as intermediary metabolism seem simple in comparison. This book represents one first step at beginning to put together the complex puzzle of the molecular basis of memory. While a strong case can be made that the molecular basis of memory will of necessity be quite complex at the biochemical level, a more difficult argument arises as to whether understanding these processes is even really important. Is it molecular stamp collecting? If all the nervous system really cares about is the firing of action potentials, isn’t the underlying biochemistry really just housekeeping? A second point that I want to try to make with this book is that understanding the underlying molecular basis is important. Where possible, I will try to utilize examples illustrating that various molecular processes are being used for information processing; information process- ing that occurs at a level independent of patterns of action potential firing. Also, I want to highlight that action potentials and neurons per se are incapable of storing information. That is because all biological processes are subserved by biochemical phenomena. This book is written from the perspective that, in the limit, neurons are bags of chemicals and the fundamental unit of information storage is the molecule. This book seeks to take the reader from a basic background of learning theory and synaptic physiology, to a detailed discus- sion of the biochemical mechanisms of long-term changes in synaptic function and information storage, to a discussion of the molecular basis of learning and memory disorders. Themes that are highlighted include: • Genes and gene regulation in memory formation. • The role of long-term changes in synaptic function in memory. • Does Long Term Potentiation = Memory? • Multimodal signal integration at the molecular level and its role in cognition as related to memory. • Learning disorders with a focus on mental retardation syndromes. • Memory disorders with a focus on Alzheimer’s Disease. • The biochemical basis of cellular information processing. • Biochemical mechanisms for information storage. A few comments concerning references are in order. There have been many thousands of publications in the fields that are covered by this book. The chapters covering LTP biochemistry, which is the area that the book covers in the greatest detail, are drawn from about 900 primary publications. Some single paragraphs in these sections summarize work from about 50 different research papers. In writing the book, I had to make a decision – I could write sentences like “Postsynaptic calcium is known to be involved in LTP induction: blocking a rise in postsynaptic calcium blocks LTP induction, elevating post- synaptic calcium elicits synaptic poten- tiation, and a rise in postsynaptic calcium has been shown to occur with LTP- inducing stimulation.” Or I could write sentences like “X et al., Y et al., and Z et al. showed that injecting calcium chelators postsynaptically blocked LTP induction, P et al., Q et al., and Z et al. showed that ….” The latter type of sentence, the historical narrative, obviously has a more scholarly tone and gives appropriate credit to X et al., etc. However, it rapidly leads to bloated verbiage that is much more difficult to read. Taking all this into consideration, I decided to handle the citations in the following way. At the end of each chapter is a section titled “References,” which is a little different from the typical list of references in terms of its content. It is not exhaustive. “References” is the short list of papers that were the xiv PREFACE 8957-Prelims 25/7/03 11:56 AM Page xiv principal papers I used in preparing the chapter, and there is a distinct bias toward citing reviews that I feel are particularly lucid and informative. In a real sense, the references are my list of recommended readings for further information. The cited reviews are a place where readers looking for more detailed references can find cita- tions to the extensive list of primary litera- ture. I apologize in advance to the many researchers whose primary papers I have not cited directly. I strongly encourage anyone with any complaint, correction, criticism or sug- gested addition to e-mail me (david@cns. neusc.bcm.tmc.edu). Constructive criticism is the only means by which the content of the book may be improved in the future. So, when John Lisman wants to fire off a scathing critique of my inadequate repre- sentation of his work, I encourage him to send me an e-mail so that I can take his comments into consideration in future writing efforts. I want to emphasize that I encourage everyone to do this. I want the post-doc who spent two years optimizing assays for measuring protein kinase activation, so that they could measure an LTP-associated increase in CaMKII, to be able to e-mail me and get at least some recognition for their effort. In cases like this it is likely to be helpful to send me the relevant citation and a few sentences describing its significance and relevance. The overall goal of encouraging this sort of interaction is to allow a means for dynamically correcting and updating the book content. Finally, I am more than happy to share Powerpoint files containing the figures from the book with anyone who would like to use them for teaching purposes, etc. An e-mail to the above addresswill suffice to get that particular ball rolling. David Sweatt xvPREFACE 8957-Prelims 25/7/03 11:56 AM Page xv