Prévia do material em texto
Oral Tranexamic Acid for the Treatment of Melasma: A Review Harini R. Bala, MBBS,* Senhong Lee, MBBS,† Celestine Wong, MBBS,* Amit.G. Pandya, MD,‡ and Michelle Rodrigues, FACD*xk BACKGROUND Melasma is a common acquired disorder of hyperpigmentation that commonly affects those with skin of color. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a novel treatment for melasma that has a multimodal mechanism of action. OBJECTIVE To provide a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the evidence on the mode of action, safety profile, and efficacy of TXA in the treatment of melasma. MATERIALS AND METHODS The literature was searched for publications on TXA in the treatment of mel- asma using MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar. RESULTS Oral TXA has clearly demonstrated the efficacy for melasma in Asian skin, even in low doses (e.g., 500 mg daily) over short periods (8–12 weeks). It is also a safe therapeutic option, which is easy to administer with few and mild side effects. Studies have shown that TXA does not increase the thromboembolic risk, although patients should be screened carefully for contraindications and risk factors prior to commencement of the therapy. CONCLUSION Oral TXA is a safe and efficacious treatment for refractory melasma. It should be considered in cases that are unresponsive to topical hydroquinone and combination topical therapy over a period of approximately 12 weeks and without contraindications to oral TXA. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters. Melasma is a common, chronic, acquired disorderofpigmentationpresentingwith light,darkbrown macules on the face.1 Males and females in all racial subgroups may be affected.2 The significant morbidity of melasma and its negative impact on quality of life is well documented.3 Despite this, the paucity of therapeutic innovation for melasma has been a source of frustration for both patients and clinicians. Hydroquinone has been the gold standard for the treatment of melasma for many decades, but over the past few years, oral tranexamic acid (TXA), with its demonstrated efficacy and rarity of side effects, has begun to emerge as the possible new gold standard therapy for melasma. The exact etiology of melasma is unknown, but it is thought to be complex and multifactorial involving both environmental and genetic influences.3,4 Known common triggers and exacerbating factors include pregnancy, hormonal therapy, ultraviolet (UV) radi- ation, and, in those with richly pigmented skin, visible light.4–6 Increased numbers of mast cells and vascular endothelial growth factor have been demonstrated in lesional skin of those with melasma.4,7,8 Kang and colleagues9 found melanin throughout all epidermal layers and an increase in the intensity and the number of epidermal melanocytes and dermal melanophages in melasma-affected skin.3 The presence of solar elas- tosis in lesional skin indicated UV damage, and the increase of intracellular organelles, such as mito- chondria, within the lesional melanocytes suggested greater activity in comparison to normal skin.3,9 Additionally, Noh and colleagues10 studied the *Skin and Cancer Foundation Inc., Melbourne, Australia; †Department of Medicine, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia; ‡Department of Dermatology, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; xDepartment of Dermatology, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Victoria, Australia; kDepartment of Dermatology, St Vincent’s Hospital, Victoria, Australia © 2018 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 1076-0512 · Dermatol Surg 2018;0:1–12 · DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001518 1 © 2018 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. inflammatory features of melasma in Asian skin and reported more melanophages, mast cells, and leuko- cytes in lesional skin. Elimination of causative factors and photoprotection is paramount in all patients. The current gold standard in the United States for the treatment of melasma is hydroquinone. A previous study demonstrated clear- ance of melasma with hydroquinone alone in approximately 40% of patients.11 However, adverse effects associated with hydroquinone use include irri- tant dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, post- inflammatory hyperpigmentation, nail bleaching, and exogenous ochronosis (a rare but permanent bluish gray discoloration of skin),2,3 making hydroquinone alternatives highly sought after. Treatment for melasma is often challenging.3 Tyrosinase is a key enzyme that is involved in the rate-limiting processes of melanogenesis, and vari- ous therapies, including hydroquinone, are aimed at inhibiting this enzyme.12 Conventional first-line treatments for melasma include various topical agents, including hydroquinone, retinoids, and alpha- and beta-hydroxy acids.2 Some of these treatments, however, are limited by cutaneous side effects and often only result in partial lightening.2 Second-line agents include physical therapies such as chemical peels and low-fluence Q-switched neodymium-doped: yttrium aluminium garnet laser (QS-Nd:YAG) (known as “laser toning”), but the need for multiple treatments over several months, complications after several treatments, and the financial burden of these therapies are limiting fac- tors.1,2 The cost and risk-to-benefit ratio, particu- larly in those with skin of color, needs to be carefully considered.2 Over the past 5 years, a plethora of literature demon- strating efficacy and safety of oral TXA in the Asia Pacific region for the treatmentofmelasmahas surfaced. Despite promising results with oral TXA for the treat- ment of melasma in Asian patients, there are no studies evaluating this therapy in those with Hispanic, Cauca- sian, Mediterranean, Middle Eastern, or African American backgrounds. To date, TXA has not been Food and Drug Administration approved for melasma. Mechanism of Action and Pharmacokinetics Tranexamic acidwas discovered to inhibit bleeding by its effects on the conversion of plasmin and thus sub- sequently stopping fibrinolysis over 50 years ago.13,14 Its primary use in the 1990s was to induce hemostasis in surgical procedures and for the treatment of menorrhagia.15 Aside from haemostatic effects, TXA also displays both anti-inflammatory and antiallergic properties.16 Tranexamic acid, which is a synthetic derivative of the amino acid lysine, binds to lysine residues of plasminogen and prevents its conversion to plasmin (Figure 1).14,17 Sadako18 were the first to describe TXA for the treat- ment of melasma in 1979. This was an accidental finding while attempting to study TXA for the treat- ment of urticaria. This prompted a study of TXA on melasma patients.19 Lightening of melasma was seen after 4 weeks of 1.5 g daily dosing of TXA alongside Vitamins B, C, and E supplementation.18 Maeda and colleagues20,21 investigated the role of TXA in human melanocyte and keratinocyte cultures. Results revealed that TXA inhibits epidermal mela- nocyte tyrosinase activity by blocking the interaction of melanocytes and keratinocytes via the inhibition of the plasminogen/plasmin system.20 In addition, they suggested that the inhibition of plasminogen binding to keratinocytes decreases the production of inflam- matory mediators arachidonic acid and prostaglan- din, which are known melanocyte stimulators.12,20,21 Tranexamic acid also prevents UV light–induced plasmin activity, decreases mast cell activity, and inhibits fibroblast growth factor, subsequently decreasing vascularity and mast cell numbers in the dermis.7,21–26 Due to the similarity between TXA and tyrosinase structurally, it is postulated that TXA also competitively antagonises the enzyme, adding further to the lightening effect (Figure 1).26,27 Dosing and Adverse Effects Profile The primary concernwith the use of TXA formelasma has been the risk of developingarterial and venous thromboses. Callender and colleagues34 in 1970 THE USE OF TRANEXAMIC AC ID FOR MELASMA DERMATOLOG IC SURGERY2 © 2018 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. documented that 1 g of TXA used over the first 4 days of the menstrual cycle decreased menorrhagia with no significant difference in side effects between the con- trol and placebo arms.34 Clinical trials, some con- ducted over 1 year, led to the approval of TXA for menorrhagia with only mild side effects reported. These included nasal and sinus discomfort, back pain, musculoskeletal pain, oligomenorrhea, and abdomi- nal cramps, with no evidence of ocular toxicity.15,35 Retinal degeneration has been previously reported in animal studies with higher doses of TXA.36,37 Theil37 studied TXA in human use for more than 6 years and found TXA to demonstrate no ocular toxicity, par- ticularly no retinal damage. Various studies have since reviewed the use of TXA in hemorrhagic conditions and have deemed TXA safe with nausea and diarrhea being the most commonly reported side effects.38 Studies that evaluated intra- or postoperative use of TXA for hemostasis have yet to find a connection between TXA and thromboembolic risk, with similar side effects reported in treatment and control arms.39–41 A long-term follow-up study was conducted in women who used 3.9 g of TXA per day for 5 days over 29 menstrual cycles.42 Common side effects reported in this trial included headache, menstrual, and back pain.42 While there were reported cases of thrombosis with oral TXA for the use of bleeding, these patients usually had risk factors identified for hypercoagulability, which included clotting disorders, history of pulmo- nary emboli (PE), prolonged immobility, hormone therapy, drug interactions, active bleeding, cancer, and surgery43–47 Data evaluation at this point suggests that TXA does not increase thromboembolic risk, and treatment has not demonstrated any serious adverse events in women with menorrhagia.35,48–51 This is further supported by data from population-based studies.50 In further details, 23 and 14 trials (TXA vs control) reported data for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, respectively.50 A total of 1,472 and 1,006 patients were included, respectively, and subsequently randomized to either theTXAgroup or the control group (who did not receive TXA).50 It Figure 1. Tranexamic acid, mode of action. Plasminogen (PA) resides in keratinocytes and basal cells.14 Ultraviolet (UV) radiation stimulates the keratinocyte–PA pathway and thus melanogenesis.14,28 Hormones also stimulate the keratinocyte– PA pathway.14 Tranexamic acid inhibits pigmentation induced by ultraviolet radiation by various mechanisms including the following: plasmin increases single chain urokinase PA (Sc-uPA), which increases tyrosinase activity and keratinocyte growth.19 Tranexamic acid is thought to inhibit this pathway and thus decrease the activity of tyrosinase.16 Tranexamic acid prevents the binding of plasminogen to the keratinocyte.19 Tranexamic acid reduces the production of prohormone cov- ertase (PC2). PC2 is involved in the proopiomelanocortin system (PMOC) in producing a-melanocyte–stimulating hormone (a-MSH). This subsequent decrease in a-MSH despite UV stimulation of the PMOC gene results in lightening of the skin.16,29 Via blocking plasminogen to plasmin, inflammatory mediators such as AA, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), leukotriene, and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) are reduced decreasing melanogenesis19,30–33. AA, arachondonic acid; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; UV, ultraviolet. BALA ET AL 0 : 0 :MONTH 201 8 3 © 2018 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. was demonstrated that the risk of developing a DVTs or apulmonary embolismwasnot increasedwithTXA treatment.50 Doses of TXAused formelasma in studies to date have ranged from 500 to 1,500mg daily.18,52 A typical dose is 250 mg twice daily. Treatment is usually continued for 8 to 12 weeks.52 This is in contrast to menorrhagia forwhich the dose is 3.9 to 4 gdaily for up to 5days per month.35 Contraindications to Tranexamic Acid Therapy Contraindications to therapy include comorbidities such as renal dysfunction, malignancy, cardiovascu- lar, respiratory disease, current anticoagulant therapy, and history of thromboembolic disease, including DVT, PE, arterial thrombosis, stroke,and sub- arachnoid hemorrhage.52,53 Other risk factors for thromboembolism such as pregnancy, hormonal contraception or replacement therapy, smoking, and long distance travel should also be taken into account when assessing suitability and should be considered as an exclusion criteria if present.53 Patients must be screened carefully through careful history for contra- indications and risks and subsequently given careful instructions to monitor for side effects prior to initia- tion of therapy with TXA. Summary of the Literature Sadako18 were the first to describe the use of TXA for the treatment for melasma in 1979 in Japan. Improvement in melasma was noted in 4 weeks with doses of 1.5 g daily in combinationwith Vitamins B, C and E.18 Since then, there has been growing use of topical, oral, and injectable TXA in Asia. In 2011, Cho and colleagues27 published the first TXA study for melasma in the English language. Five hun- dred milligrams of oral TXA daily was used as an adjuvant treatment to intense pulsed light (IPL). This blinded study comprised 51 cases in 2 arms; oral TXA in combination with IPL and laser versus IPL only. Both groups were instructed to put on a broad- spectrum sunscreen during and after treatments. The modified melasma area and severity index (mMASI) scores and photographs were evaluated.27 The mean mMASI score decreased from 11.33 6 7.07 to 6.216 5.04 in the treatment group and 11.706 6.72 to 8.936 5.89 in the control group.27 The results were statistically significant with no serious side effects documented.27 In 2012, a 16-week, prospective, open-label study of 35 patients was conducted in Beijing, China.54 A treatment regimen of TXA dosed 250 mg 3 times per day was used. All patients were advised to apply broad-spectrum sunscreen. The study employed a 5-point scoring scale to evaluate the severity of melasma. Eighty-five percent of patients experienced improvement at 4 weeks with 100% response by the end of the study.54 Mild adverse effects were reported including slightly elevated alanine transaminase (3%), gastrointestinal discomfort such as nausea and vom- iting (12.5%), early menstruation (1, 3%), delayed menstruation (1, 3%), and drowsiness (1, 3%). In 2012, another randomized, prospective clinical trial involving 48 women aged between 18 and 55 years were recruited from a single site in Seoul, South Korea.55 Oral TXA combined with low-fluence QS-Nd:YAG laser was studied for the treatment of melasma. The participants were divided into 2 arms: a combination group and a laser treatment group. All participants were treated with 2 sessions of low- fluence QS-Nd:YAG laser and were advised to apply sunscreen. Those in the combination group were also provided with 8 weeks supply of 750 mg TXA. The mean MASI score 4 weeks after the second treatment decreased significantly in both the groups from base line (combination group: 37.8 + 23.9%vs laser group: 21.9 + 18.5%; p = .02), with the combination group treated with TXA demonstrating better results. Mild side effects such as heartburn and nausea were reported. A large case series byWuand colleagues,17 conducted in 2012, involved 74 women in Hangzhou, China. The efficacy and safety profile of TXAat a dose of 250 mg twice daily for more than 6 months was assessed. All patients were advised to apply sunscreen. Photo- graphs were taken every 4 weeks, and 2 independent assessors performedevaluations.17 An excellent response was defined as the area of involvement THE USE OF TRANEXAMIC AC ID FOR MELASMA DERMATOLOG IC SURGERY4 © 2018 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. decreasing by 90%, good was defined as the area of involvement decreasing by 60%, fair was defined as area of involvement decreasing by 30%, and a poor result was defined as an area of improvement involving less than 30%. The study results revealed that more than half of the participants demonstrated a good response (54%), one-third had a fair response (31.1%), and more than 10% had an excellent response. Less than 5% of the participants were reported to have poor results. Gastrointestinal dis- comfort (5.4%) and hypomenorrhea (8.1%)were the reported side effects.17 Melasma recurrence was observed in 7 cases (9.5%). In 2013, a case series of 22 women was reported from Seoul, South Korea.7 The 8-week trial evalu- ated 250 mg of TXA 3 times per day in conjunction with twice daily application of 1% TXA topically.7 All subjects were also advised to apply sunscreen. The mean melanin index scores for lesional skin decreased significantly, and histological analysis showed significant reduction of epidermal pigmen- tation, blood vessel number, and mast cell count.7 Epidermal pigmentation, erythema, and melasma- related dermal changes, such as vascular angiogen- esis and increased mast cells counts, also improved.7 All 22 women completed the study with no adverse effects reported.7 More recently, 40 patients with melasma were recruited into an open-labeled, randomized, compar- ative trial comparing 250 mg of TXA twice daily with triple combination cream (TCC) (Group B) with TCC alone (Group A).26 All patients were advised to apply broad-spectrum sunscreen. Treatment response was evaluated using the melasma severity index. The comparison between the treatment Group A and GroupB showed statistically significant results (Group AMasi at 8weeks 6.9956 6.056 andGroup B 2.196 2.378) at 4 and 8 weeks. No significant side effects were noted, and all 40 patients completed the trial.26 There were limitations of this study, which included the absence of information about other topical thera- pies used and lack of blinding.26 The largest study to date was published in 2016 by Lee and colleagues.52 In this retrospective study, 561 patients were treated with TXA 250 mg twice daily. Ninety-five percent of participants were classified as having treatment-resistant melasma (prior therapy with no satisfactory clearance).52 Given the retro- spective nature of this study, not all patients have used sunblock. Lightening of lesional skin was observed within 2months of treatment, and 89.7%patients had documented improvement, 10% remained unchanged, and 0.4% worsened. Of the patients who improved, the reported lightening rate was 50%.52 Assessments were made on the physician global assessments as documented in patient files.52 7.1% of patients reported mild side effects including abdomi- nal bloating and headache. One patient developed a DVT 6weeks into therapy. This was in the setting of undiagnosed familial protein S deficiency. The study concluded that TXA at 250 mg twice daily is a valu- able adjuvant in treatment-resistant melasma. This study also highlighted the importance of a detailed history in order to exclude contraindications to therapy. The literature is summarized in Table 1. The role of oral TXA on nonlesional skin remains unclear. In a large case series, it is found that in some patients who had both melasma and other hyperpig- mented lesions (i.e., freckles and senile lentigo), TXA treatment improved their melasma but not the other hyperpigmented lesions.17 It was postulated that these other hyperpigmentation diseases may involve differ- ent pathogeneses that TXA does not interfere with.17 Interestingly, in another case series, a combination of topical and oral TXA had reduced the melanin index score for lesional skin but increased the melanin index score in perilesional skin.7 The darkening of the per- ilesional skin was attributed to a change in season, from spring to summer.7 On the other hand, in the study conducted by Li and colleagues,54 their study demonstrated that TXA treatment improved the skin color for both lesional skin and nonlesional skin. The former demonstrated marked improvement, while the latter showed moderate improvement.54 However, it was not explained in the article whether this obser- vation could be attributed to seasonal changes. Larger studies are required to clarify the role of oral TXA on nonlesional skin. BALA ET AL 0 : 0 :MONTH 201 8 5 © 2018 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. TABLE 1. Summary of Studies (Focusing Primarily on English Publications) Year Study No. Cases vs Controls TXA Arm (Oral) Concurrent Treatment Control Arm Duration (Wk) Results Side Effects Additional Comments 1979 Sadako and colleagues (Japan) 12 cases, 0 controls 1.5 g daily Vitamins B, C, E — 20 11 cases demonstrated an obvious result Nil reported Effect was noted in 4 wk 1985 Hajime and colleagues56 (Japan) 40 cases, 0 Controls 1–1.5 g daily 10 33 cases had a reported decreased severity 1988 Higashi and colleagues57 (Japan) 11 cases, 0 controls 0.75–1.5 g daily Not indicated exactly, article states, “a couple of mo” 11 cases reported with decreased severity Nil reported Recurrence of melasma noted a few mo post cessation of treatment 2001 Zhu and colleagues58 (China) 128 cases 30 controls 750 mg daily Vitamins C and E Vitamins C and E 6–8 Improvement: 20% > 95%, 30% > 60%, 33% = 20%– 60% Mild gastrointestinal cases reported p < .001 Important findings that increased duration was more effective than higher doses of TXA In addition, TXA did not alter the clotting profile 2005 Liu and colleagues59 (China) 176 cases, 70 controls 750 mg/d + Vitamins C and E Vitamins C and E 8 24% > 90%, 40% > 60% 5% of participants in both treatment and control reported gastrointestinal symptoms p < .01 T H E U S E O F T R A N E X A M IC A C ID F O R M E L A S M A D E R M A T O L O G IC S U R G E R Y 6 © 2018 by the A m erican S ociety for D erm atologic S urgery, Inc. P ublished by W olters K luw er H ealth, Inc. U nauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. TABLE 1. (Continued) Year Study No. Cases vs Controls TXA Arm (Oral) Concurrent Treatment Control Arm Duration (Wk) Results Side Effects Additional Comments 2008 Wu and colleagues60 (China) 256 cases, 0 controls 500 mg daily 24 10.5% > 90%, 19% > 60%, 51%, 30% 4.3% of participants reported gastrointestinal symptoms 33% response 4 wk; 33% in 8 wk 3.5% reported menstrual irregularity TXA did not alter the clotting profile 2008 Mafune and colleagues61 99 cases, 100 controls 2.25 g daily Placebo 8 76.8% of participants improved 1 transient chest discomfort p < .001 2011 Cho and colleagues27 (Korea) 24 cases, 27 controls 500 mg daily IPL/Nd:YAG laser IPL/Nd:YAG 24 A decrease in mMASI, 43.8% vs 23.6% Mild headache in 4 patients p < .005 2012 Shin and colleagues55 (Korea) 23 cases, 21 controls 750 mg daily (compound) Low fluence QS-Nd:YAG laser Low fluence QS-Nd:YAG laser 8 A decrease in mMASI however no significant, decrease in melanin index 3 patients reported GIT side effects TXA increased the efficacy of laser and reduced the frequency of laser treatment 2012 Wu and colleagues17 (China) 75 cases, 0 controls 250 mg twice daily 24 (follow up at 6 mo) Excellent 10.8%, Good 54%, Fair 31.1%, Poor 4.1% 5.4% of patients reported GIT effects. 58% reported hypomenorrhoea The recurrence rate noted in thetrial was 9.5% 82% of results were noted in the first 4 wk 2012 Karn and colleagues62 (Nepal) 130 cases, 130 controls 250 mg twice daily Routine topical treatment Routine topical treatment 12 Statistically significant decrease in MASI in the control group B A L A E T A L 0 :0 :M O N T H 2 0 1 8 7 © 2018 by the A m erican S ociety for D erm atologic S urgery, Inc. P ublished by W olters K luw er H ealth, Inc. U nauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. TABLE 1. (Continued) Year Study No. Cases vs Controls TXA Arm (Oral) Concurrent Treatment Control Arm Duration (Wk) Results Side Effects Additional Comments 2013 Na J and colleagues7 (Korea) 25 cases, 0 controls 125 mg twice daily 2% TXA and 2% niacinamide topically 8 No serious effects noted Study reported different effects on lesional vs nonlesional skin 2013 Li and colleagues54 (China) 35 cases, 0 controls Compound TXA (Dai- ichi pharma Japan) 3 times daily 16 Moderate improvement 3 cases reported GIT side effects, 3 cases with menstrual irregularities, 1 case of drowsiness, and 1 patient with increased liver function tests 85% of cases improved in 4 wk 2014 Aamir and colleagues63 (Pakistan) 65 cases 250 mg twice daily 24 15 cases had an excellent response, 41 with good and 8 fair Mild side effects including gastrointestinal symptoms, palpitation, and oligomenorrhea Study reported TXA as a safe and effective treatment for melasma 2015 Padhi, Pradhan26 (India) 20 case, 20 controls 250 mg twice daily TTC (fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%, tretinoin 0.05%, hydroquinone 2%) daily TTC (fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%, tretinoin 0.05%, hydroquinone 2%) daily 8 54.65% saw a decrease in in MASI (15.425– 6.995), 88% saw a decrease in MASI (from 18.243 to 2.19) TTC—faster, more sustained effect when TXA is added 2016 Tan and colleagues23 (Singapore) 25 250 mg twice daily Combination topical therapy Mean improvement of 69%. Significantly lower MASI scores p < .01 Low-dose TXA is useful for refractory melasma T H E U S E O F T R A N E X A M IC A C ID F O R M E L A S M A D E R M A T O L O G IC S U R G E R Y 8 © 2018 by the A m erican S ociety for D erm atologic S urgery, Inc. P ublished by W olters K luw er H ealth, Inc. U nauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. In 2 studies, subjects withmelasmawere stratified into various subtypes via Wood’s lamp, that is, epidermal, dermal, and mixed. Although all subtypes of melasma responded well to TXA, both studies highlighted that epidermal melasma tends to demonstrate more sig- nificant clinical improvement when compared to der- mal ormixed variants.62,63 The underlyingmechanism of this phenomenon remains unclear, and further studies are required to clarify this. It is important to note that many patients with melasma have a dermal component even if not clinically visible. There are studies to support the therapeutic efficacy of TXA via various route of administration (i.e., oral, topical and intradermal) for melasma.64 In a study conducted by Steiner and colleagues,65 it was found that topical and intradermal TXA were both effective for the treatment of melasma objectively, without statistical difference between the 2 groups. However, no studies have directly compared the efficacy of oral TXA versus topical or intradermal TXA. Kim and colleagues66 had recently conducted a meta-analysis examining the efficacy of TXAmelasma. It was found that with oral, intradermal, and topical TXA, the standardized mean reduction inMASI was 2.46 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–3.8;p< .001; I2 = 71%), 1.42 (95% CI, 0.98–1.87; p < .001; I2 = 72%), and 1.36 (95% CI, 20.17 to 2.9; p = .08, I2 = 74%), respectively.66 However, further studies will be required to compare oral TXA versus topical or intradermal TXA directly. There is a clear role forTXA in the treatment ofmelasma given its safe and effective profile. However, its exact position in the therapeutic ladder for melasma remains poorly defined. The present standard of care is the triple combination cream that contains hydroquinone, ste- roids, and tretinoin. Unfortunately, there was no direct comparison study to evaluate the effect of oral TXA versus the combination cream. There is evidence that oral TXA is effective alone or as an adjunct with other therapeutic modalities (e.g., topical therapy and laser). It also has a role in melasma that is resistant to conven- tional topical therapies.23 Based on the available data in the literature, it is recommended that oral TXA should only be used only in cases of melasma that are unre- sponsive to topical hydroquinone and combination T A B L E 1 . (C o n ti n u e d ) Y e a r S tu d y N o . C a s e s v s C o n tr o ls T X A A rm (O ra l) C o n c u rr e n t T re a tm e n t C o n tr o l A rm D u ra ti o n (W k ) R e s u lt s S id e E ff e c ts A d d it io n a l C o m m e n ts 2 0 1 6 L e e a n d c o ll e a g u e s 5 2 (S in g a p o re ) 5 6 1 2 5 0 m g tw ic e d a il y 1 6 Im p ro v e m e n t n o te d in 8 9 .7 % (5 0 % li g h te n in g ), 1 0 .0 % re m a in e d u n c h a n g e d , 0 .4 % w o rs e n e d . 7 .1 % o f p a ti e n ts re p o rt e d s id e e ff e c ts s u c h a s a b d o m in a l b lo a ti n g a n d h e a d a c h e s ; 1 p a ti e n t d e v e lo p e d a D V T ; h o w e v e r, w a s la te r fo u n d to h a v e fa m il ia l p ro te in S d e fi c ie n c y . 1 .8 % w e re o n m o n o th e ra p y 9 4 % w e re o n d e p ig m e n ti n g c re a m s 3 5 .5 % h a d p ri o r la s e r w it h T X A a d d e d o n a s a n a d ju v a n t 8 w k to re s p o n s e D V T , d e e p v e in th ro m b o s is ; G IT , g a s tr o in te s ti n a l tr a c t; IP L , in te n s e p u ls e d li g h t; m M A S I, m o d ifi e d m e la s m a a re a a n d s e v e ri ty in d e x ; T T C , tr ip le th e ra p y c o m b in a ti o n ; T X A , tr a n e x a m ic a c id . BALA ET AL 0 : 0 :MONTH 201 8 9 © 2018 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. topical therapyover a period of approximately 12weeks and if there are no contraindications to oral TXA. However, large-scale, randomized controlled trials are warranted to better characterize the role of oral TXA in the therapeutic ladder of melasma. Melasma is known to have high relapse rates.52 Multiple studies have revealed that melasma tend to recur post cessation of TXA treatment.17,23,52,57 In a case series conducted by Wu and colleagues,17 the recurrence of melasma was observed in 9.5% of patients (7 of 74) after 6 months. It was found that these recurrences could be effectively treated with a repeat intake of TXA.17 Lee and colleagues also demonstrated that melasma relapsed in 27.2% of patients (137 of 503) with a median duration of 7 months upon cessation of oral TXA. The highest relapse rate was observed in the study by Tan and colleagues, with 72% of patients relapsed within 2 months post cessation of TXA.23 This could be explained by the fact that their study only included patients with recalcitrant melasma not cleared by conventional topical therapy.23 This suggests that treatment-resistant cases are more prone to recur- rence. These studies highlight that TXA treatment may need to be maintained for a more extended period, especially in treatment-resistant cases. More research on the ideal dosage and duration of TXA intake to result in clearance of melasma without recurrence is required. Summary and Future Directions Tranexamic acid is the first systemic therapy to be studied for melasma. It has clearly demonstrated the efficacy for melasma in Asian skin, even in low doses (e.g., 500mg daily) over short periods (8–12weeks). It has also established itself as a safe therapeutic option, which iseasy to administer with few, reversible, and mild side effects. Studies have shown that TXA does not increase thromboembolic risk, although patients should be screened carefully for contraindications and risk factors prior to commencement of the therapy. Patients shouldbewell informedof the risks associated with therapy and counseled adequately prior to the initiation of therapy. Based on the available data in the literature, it is recommended that oral TXA should only be used only in cases of melasma that are unresponsive to topical hydroquinone and combi- nation topical therapy over a period of approxi- mately 12weeks and if there are no contraindications to oral TXA. However, large-scale, randomized controlled trials are warranted to better characterize the role of oral TXA in the therapeutic ladder of melasma. Despite the plethora of studies now pub- lished on the successful use of oral TXA for the treatment of melasma, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trials and data from centers outside Asia are clearly needed to document safety and efficacy in non-Asian patients. References 1. Rodrigues M, Pandya AG. Melasma: clinical diagnosis and management options. Australas J Dermatol 2015;56:151–63. 2. Sheth VM, Pandya AG. Melasma: a comprehensive update: part II. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;65:699–714; quiz 715. 3. Sheth VM, Pandya AG. Melasma: a comprehensive update: part I. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;65:689–97; quiz 698. 4. Passeron T. Melasma pathogenesis and influencing factors—an overview of the latest research. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013;27: 5–6. 5. Mahmoud BH, Ruvolo E, Hexsel CL, Liu Y, et al. Impact of long- wavelength UVA and visible light on melanocompetent skin. J Invest Dermatol 2010;130:2092–7. 6. Bissonnette R, Nigen S, Bolduc C, Méry S, et al. Protection afforded by sunscreens containing inorganic sunscreening agents against blue light sensitivity induced by aminolevulinic acid. Dermatol Surg 2008;34: 1469–76. 7. Na JI, Choi SY, Yang SH, Choi HR, et al. Effect of tranexamic acid on melasma: a clinical trial with histological evaluation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013;27:1035–9. 8. Kim EH, Kim YC, Lee ES, Kang HY. The vascular characteristics of melasma. J Dermatol Sci 2007;46:111–6. 9. Kang WH, Yoon KH, Lee ES, Kim J, et al. Melasma: histopathological characteristics in 56 Korean patients. Br J Dermatol 2002;146:228–37. 10. Noh TK, Choi SJ, Chung BY, Kang JS, et al. Inflammatory features of melasma lesions in Asian skin. J Dermatol 2014;41:788–94. 11. Ennes S, Paschoalick R, Alchorne MMDA. A double-blind, comparative, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and tolerability of 4% hydroquinone as a depigmenting agent in melasma. J Dermatol Treat 2000;11:173–9. 12. Kim MS, Bang SH, Kim JH, Shin HJ, et al. Tranexamic acid diminishes laser-induced melanogenesis. Ann Dermatol 2015;27:250–6. 13. Gruen RL, Jacobs IG, Reade MC. Tranexamic acid and trauma. Med J Aust 2014;200:255. 14. Bagherani N. The efficacy of tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasma. Dermatol Ther 2015;28:265. 15. Lukes AS, Freeman EW, Van Drie D, Baker J, et al. Safety of tranexamic acid in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: an open- label extension study. Women’s health 2011;7:591–8. THE USE OF TRANEXAMIC AC ID FOR MELASMA DERMATOLOG IC SURGERY10 © 2018 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. 16. Hiramoto K, Yamate Y, Sugiyama D, Takahashi Y, et al. The gender differences in the inhibitory action of UVB-induced melanocyte activation by the administration of tranexamic acid. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2016;32:136–45. 17. Wu S, Shi H, Wu H, Yan S, et al. Treatment of melasma with oral administration of tranexamic acid. Aesthet Plast Surg 2012;36:964–70. 18. Sadako N. Treatment of melasma with tranexamic acid. Clin Rep 1979; 13:3129–31. 19. Tse TW, Hui E. Tranexamic acid: an important adjuvant in the treatment of melasma. J Cosmet Dermatol 2013;12:57–66. 20. Maeda K, Tomita Y. Mechanism of the inhibitory effect of tranexamic acid on melanogenesis in cultured human melanocytes in the presence of keratinocyte-conditioned medium. J Health Sci 2007; 53:389–96. 21. Maeda K, Naganuma M. Topical trans-4- aminomethylcyclohexanecarboxylic acid prevents ultraviolet radiation- induced pigmentation. J Photochem Photobiol B 1998;47:136–41. 22. Li D, Shi Y, Li M, Liu J, et al. Tranexamic acid can treat ultraviolet radiation-induced pigmentation in Guinea pigs. Eur J Dermatol 2010; 20:289–92. 23. Tan AW, Sen P, Chua SH, Goh BK. Oral tranexamic acid lightens refractory melasma. Australas J Dermatol 2017;58:e105–8. 24. Bastaki M, Nelli EE, Dell’Era P, Rusnati M, et al. Basic fibroblast growth factor–induced angiogenic phenotype in mouse endothelium a study of aortic and microvascular endothelial cell lines. Arterioscle- rosis Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:454–64. 25. Reichel CA, Lerchenberger M, Uhl B, Rehberg M, et al. Plasmin inhibitors prevent leukocyte accumulation and remodeling events in the postischemic microvasculature. PLoS One 2011;6:e17229. 26. Padhi T, Pradhan S. Oral tranexamic acid with fluocinolone-based triple combination cream versus fluocinolone-based triple combination cream alone in melasma: an open labeled randomized comparative trial. Indian J Dermatol 2015;60:520. 27. Cho HH, Choi M, Cho S, Lee JH. Role of oral tranexamic acid in melasma patients treated with IPL and low fluence QS Nd:YAG laser. J Dermatolog Treat 2013;24:292–6. 28. Takashima A, Yasuda S, Mizuno N. Determination of the action spectrum for UV-induced plasminogen activator synthesis in mouse keratinocytes in vitro. J Dermatol Sci 1992;4:11–7. 29. Hiramoto K, Yamate Y, Sugiyama D, Takahashi Y, et al. Tranexamic acid suppresses ultraviolet B eye irradiation-induced melanocyte activation by decreasing the levels of prohormone convertase 2 and alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2014;30:302–7. 30. Tomita Y, Iwamoto M, Masuda T, Tagami H. Stimulatory effect of prostaglandin E 2 on the configuration of normal human melanocytes in vitro. J Invest Dermatol 1987;89:299–301. 31. Tomita Y, Maeda K, Tagami H. Melanocyte-stimulating properties of arachidonic acid metabolites: possible role in postinflammatory pigmentation. Pigment Cel Res 1992;5:357–61. 32. Morelli JG, Norris DA. Influence of inflammatory mediators and cytokines on human melanocyte function. J Invest Dermatol 1993;100: 191S–5S. 33. Grewe M, Trefzer U, Ballhorn A, Gyufko K, et al. Analysis of the mechanism of ultraviolet (UV) B radiation–induced prostaglandin E 2 synthesis by human epidermoid carcinoma cells. J Invest Dermatol 1993;101:528–31. 34. Callender ST, Warner GT, Cope E. Treatment of menorrhagia with tranexamic acid. A double-blind trial. Br Med J 1970;4:214–6. 35. Leminen H, Hurskainen R. Tranexamic acid for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: efficacy and safety. Int J Womens Health 2012;4: 413–21. 36. Akagi A, Ohnishi Y, Tajima S, Ishibashi A. Linear hyperpigmentation with extensive epidermal apoptosis: a variant of linear lichen planus pigmentosus? J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;50:78–80. 37. Theil PL. Ophthalmological examination of patients in long-term treatment with tranexamic acid. Acta ophthalmologica 1981;59: 237–41. 38. Dunn CJ, Goa KL. Tranexamic acid: a review of its use in surgery and other indications. Drugs 1999;57:1005–32. 39. Kakar PN, Gupta N, Govil P, Shah V. Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in control of bleeding following TKR: a randomized clinical trial. Indian J Anaesth 2009;53:667–71. 40. Benoni G, Fredin H. Fibrinolytic inhibition with tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and blood transfusion after knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study of 86 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:434–40. 41. Bekassy Z, Astedt B. Treatment with the fibrinolytic inhibitor tranexamic acid–risk for thrombosis? Acta Obstetricia GynecologicaScand 1990;69:353–4. 42. Muse K, Lukes AS, Gersten J, Waldbaum A, et al. Long-term evaluation of safety and health-related quality of life in women with heavy menstrual bleeding treated with oral tranexamic acid. Womens Health (Lond) 2011;7:699–707. 43. Taparia M, Cordingley FT, Leahy MF. Pulmonary embolism associated with tranexamic acid in severe acquired haemophilia. Eur J Haematol 2002;68:307–9. 44. Cronin C, Fitzpatrick D, Temperley I. Multiple pulmonary emboli in a patient with afibrinogenaemia. Acta Haematologica 1988;79:53–4. 45. Krivokuca I, Lammers JW. Recurrent pulmonary embolism associated with a hemostatic drug: tranexamic acid. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2011;17:106–7. 46. Woo KS, Tse LKK, Woo JLF, Vallane-Owen J. After antifibrinolytic therapy. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:116–7. 47. Calapai G, Gangemi S, Mannucci C, Minciullo PL, et al. Systematic review of tranexamic acid adverse reactions. J Pharmacovigilance 2015;3:171. 48. Berntorp E, Follrud C, Lethagen S. No increased risk of venous thrombosis in women taking tranexamic acid. Thromb Haemost 2001; 86:714–5. 49. Poeran J, Rasul R, Suzuki S, Danninger T, et al. Tranexamic acid use and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty in the United States: retrospective analysis of effectiveness and safety. BMJ 2014;349:g4829. 50. Henry DA. Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Libr 2011;19:CD001886. 51. Sundstrom A, Seaman H, Kieler H, Alfredsson L. The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with the use of tranexamic acid and other drugs used to treat menorrhagia: a case-control study using the general practice research database. BJOG 2009;116:91–7. 52. Lee HC, Thng TG, Goh CL. Oral tranexamic acid (TA) in the treatment of melasma: a retrospective analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016;75:385–92. 53. Anderson FA, Spencer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003;107(23 Suppl 1):I9–16. 54. Li Y, Sun Q, He Z, Fu L, et al. Treatment of melasma with oral administration of compound tranexamic acid: a preliminary clinical trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014;28:393–4. 55. Shin JU, Park J, Oh SH, Lee JH. Oral tranexamic acid enhances the efficacy of low-fluence 1064-nm quality-switched neodymium-doped BALA ET AL 0 : 0 :MONTH 201 8 11 © 2018 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. yttrium aluminum garnet laser treatment for melasma in Koreans: a randomized, prospective trial. Dermatol Surg 2013;39:435–42. 56. Hajime M, Mineo T, Yoshio T. Oral administration therapy with tranexamic acid for melasma. Nishinihon J Dermatol 1985;47:1101–4. 57. Higashi N. Treatment of melasma with oral tranexamic acid. Skin Res 1988;30:676–80. 58. Zhu HJ, Yang XH. The clinical study of acidum tranexamicum on melasma. Pharm Prog 2001;3:178–81. 59. Liu H, Ku CY, Yang XH. Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in treating melasma and observation of its safety (Chinese). Chin J Med Aesth Cosmet 2005;11:361–3. 60. Wu SF, Shi HY, Chen Y, Yan S, et al. Treatment of melasma with oral administration of tranexamic acid [J]. Chin J Aesthet Plast Surg 2008;2:010. 61. Mafune E, Morimoto Y, Iizuka Y. Tranexamic acid and melasma. Farumashia 2008;44:437–42. 62. Karn D, Kc S, Amatya A, Razouria EA, et al. Oral tranexamic acid for the treatment of melasma. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2014;10:40–3. 63. Aamir S, Naseem R. Oral tranexamic acid in treatment of melasma in Pakistani population: a pilot study. J Pakistan Assoc Dermatologists 2014;24:198–203. 64. Taraz M, Niknam S, Ehsani AH. Tranexamic acid in treatment of melasma: a comprehensive review of clinical studies. Dermatol Ther 2016;30:e12465. 65. Steiner D, Feola C, Bialeski N, Silva FAM, et al. Study evaluating the efficacy of topical and injected tranexamic acid in treatment of melasma. Surg Cosmet Dermatol 2009;1:174–7. 66. Kim HJ, Moon SH, Cho SH, Lee JD, et al. Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in melasma: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Acta Dermato Venereologica 2017. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2668. Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Harini R. Bala, MBBS, Skin and Cancer Foundation, Level 1, 80 Drummond Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia, or e-mail: hbala@skincancer.asn.au THE USE OF TRANEXAMIC AC ID FOR MELASMA DERMATOLOG IC SURGERY12 © 2018 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. mailto:hbala@skincancer.asn.au